Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 26th Aug 2012 10:28 UTC
PDAs, Cellphones, Wireless In light of the jury verdict in Apple vs. Samsung, the one-liners and jokes flew back and forth. One in particular, by Dan Frakes, has been copied and pasted all over the web, and it goes like this: "When the iPhone debuted, it was widely criticized for having no buttons/keys. Now people think the iPhone's design is 'obvious'." This is a very common trend in this entire debate that saddens me to no end: the iPhone is being compared to simple feature phones, while in fact, it should be compared to its true predecessor: the PDA. PDAs have always done with few buttons.
Thread beginning with comment 532497
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Tony Swash
Member since:
2009-08-22

I was trying to point people such as yourself away from the sterile war of rhetoric with Apple fans, a debate that's probably going nowhere, towards a more pressing debate and one which is of some consequence. What happens now? Apple won big, it may be overturned on appeal but probably not, and Apple will continue to move forward with more aggressive legal actions, and will probably win more cases. I repeat what happens now? If you support Google and Android then what strategy is best from now on? To escalate the IP wars? To change course and concentrate on product differentiation and try to out design Apple? I am genuinely interested in that debate and in hearing what people such as yourself think about such questions.

BTW - Google is an advertising company. If you think different perhaps could you point me at some of the non-advertising products that Google sells and what proportion of the company's revenues they generate. The latest figures I have seen say Google gets 95% of it's revenue from ads.

Reply Parent Score: 1

BallmerKnowsBest Member since:
2008-06-02

I was trying to point people such as yourself away from the sterile war of rhetoric with Apple fans, a debate that's probably going nowhere, towards a more pressing debate and one which is of some consequence.


For some strange reason, I'm suddenly reminded of an old quote about "removing the mote from thine own eye."

BTW - Google is an advertising company. If you think different perhaps could you point me at some of the non-advertising products that Google sells and what proportion of the company's revenues they generate. The latest figures I have seen say Google gets 95% of it's revenue from ads.


Thank you for demonstrating my point, which is that you keep repeating the "OMG advertising company" spiel as if you think you're revealing some scandalous secret - when, in fact, you're just stating the blindingly-obvious over and over again. And even though you never actually come right out and say "Google is evil because they're advertising company", you're clearly trying to imply that by constantly repeating a term that carries negative connotations for most people (also known as the fallacy of "guilt by association").

Reply Parent Score: 3