Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 26th Aug 2012 10:28 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 532516
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 23:02 UTC, submitted by M.Onty
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 22:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-01-25
The link you posted... Proclaiming it to be a good analysis. Here is an excerpt from it:
This is from your post describing the outcome of the trial (titled "Everyone Wins"):
This is good for innovation.
This is good for consumers, the industry and the whole tech market.
????????????????????
If you agree with an analysis stating that Samsung copying Apple was good for consumers... How do you then think that a trial outcome punishing them for it is also good for consumers...
I think you've been baking in Steve's reality distortion field for too long...