Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 26th Aug 2012 10:28 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 532533
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
It's nothing unusual happening here. This is the same thing as seeing patents granted which contain "innovations" that have been known for years, have been patented, but the new one has the words "on a mobile device" or "on a device with a touch screen" or an a "mobile phone with a touchscreen" etc. appended to the end of each sentence. Regarding PDAs they can defend by simply saying they were PDAs and these are touchscreen phones and whatnot. My very simple view is that if it walks like a duck and it talks like a duck...
On an unrelated note, I see "news" popping up about rumors of the new iPhone, and I'd like to add my own: they will take the GS3 hardware as it is, and install iOS on it. My, that would be a wonderful day