Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 20th Aug 2012 22:14 UTC
Legal "The web has been alight these past few weeks with the details of the Apple v. Samsung lawsuit. It's been a unique opportunity to peer behind the curtain of how these two companies operate, as the trial seeks to answer the question: did Samsung copy Apple? But there's actually another question that I think is much more interesting to the future of innovation in the technology industry: regardless of whether the courts say that Samsung copied Apple or not, would we all be better off if we allowed - even encouraged - companies to copy one another?" This is very relevant.
Thread beginning with comment 532661
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
zima
Member since:
2005-07-06

"Best and brightest" go into Serious Science(tm) ...the whole friggin' idea of which is sharing of innovation and advancements - hell, the scientific process simply wouldn't work without it!

Actual hard and expensive research (where nobody would even suggest wasting time & resources on patenting/protecting frivolous "UI inventions") is where long-term thinking really goes on, not corporate "innovative" fields & their dynamics revolving around stock market performance.
(come on, look at LHC - somehow we do manage to fund this biggest and most expensive single scientific experiment in history ...and one that is unlikely to bring any direct benefits for, say, half a century at least - and quite probably longer, when all presently living people will be dead)

Overall, realise that you're advocating a variant of broken window fallacy...

Reply Parent Score: 2