Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 27th Aug 2012 11:32 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 532900
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: That's not the way.
by Fergy on Wed 29th Aug 2012 09:51
in reply to "RE[4]: That's not the way."
Um, MS obviously isn't trying to destroy Android. They simply wanted and got reasonable patent royalties for infringements.
1. how much money has MS spend to 'invent' these software patents and idea patents?
2. could a six year old child come up with these 'inventions'?
3. how much work is it to think of it and how much work is it to write it?
RE[6]: That's not the way.
by tomcat on Wed 29th Aug 2012 21:49
in reply to "RE[5]: That's not the way."
1. how much money has MS spend to 'invent' these software patents and idea patents?
Irrelevant.
2. could a six year old child come up with these 'inventions'?
No
3. how much work is it to think of it and how much work is it to write it?
Give it a try some time and let me know. I have.




Member since:
2006-01-06
The fact that Apple and MS play in concert to destroy Android using litigation doesn't mean other os is inherently more safe from their questionable tactics.
In particular Apple and MS tactical alliance (edit) doesn't guarantee that in the future e.g. Apple programmers won't be sued by MS or WP oems by Apple.
Their cross licensing deals (who they actually cover?) have a limited time span.
Um, MS obviously isn't trying to destroy Android. They simply wanted and got reasonable patent royalties for infringements. None of the companies involved has ever asserted that MS prevents them from conducting their businesses by banning devices, etc. Whereas, Apple most definitely wants to destroy Android and prevent them from being distributed.