Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 29th Aug 2012 22:52 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 533102
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: What really kills Linux on the desktop
by justSomeGuy on Thu 30th Aug 2012 06:36
in reply to "What really kills Linux on the desktop"
...
2) People don't like things you can't pay a company for
3) People don't see advertisements for Linux on television
...
2) People don't like things you can't pay a company for
3) People don't see advertisements for Linux on television
...
This is very true, I was just saying pretty much this the other day on /.
Wrt #2, this is especially applicable to corporate setups. They want someone to sell them support contracts. AFAIK, Microsoft's support contracts don't really do anything useful for the companies that buy them. But it allows a CTO to say "Blame MS. We have contracted support with them. I've been on the phone day and night giving them an earful."
And this pleases executives. Doesn't matter that nothing useful ever gets fixed. There is a whipping boy to blame.
Wrt #3, yes, when something is on TV and perceived as being backed by a big company, it has more perceived value in peoples' minds.
I don't really care anymore what OS people use. But I've come to think that if you really want to evangelize linux, then don't send people to ubuntu.com. Send them to system76.com. They seem to have a need to pay money for something.
RE[2]: What really kills Linux on the desktop
by lucas_maximus on Thu 30th Aug 2012 08:27
in reply to "RE: What really kills Linux on the desktop"




Member since:
2007-02-18
1) People don't like the idea of change
2) People don't like things you can't pay a company for
3) People don't see advertisements for Linux on television
4) People are happy with the state of affairs with Windows or OS X.
Most people are not geeks, therefore whoever says "well I use Linux on the desktop!" are living in a cocoon world.
All these "reasons" about why Linux isn't the runaway success it should be are no more than cargo cult reasoning. "They were the state of affairs at the time of the non-success, therefore they were the cause".