Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 29th Aug 2012 22:52 UTC
Linux Miguel de Icaza: "To sum up: (a) First dimension: things change too quickly, breaking both open source and proprietary software alike; (b) incompatibility across Linux distributions. This killed the ecosystem for third party developers trying to target Linux on the desktop. You would try once, do your best effort to support the 'top' distro or if you were feeling generous 'the top three' distros. Only to find out that your software no longer worked six months later. Supporting Linux on the desktop became a burden for independent developers." Mac OS X came along to scoop up the Linux defectors.
Thread beginning with comment 533106
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Pretty alive, thanks
by tylerdurden on Thu 30th Aug 2012 02:09 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: Pretty alive, thanks"
tylerdurden
Member since:
2009-03-17

That is nice, but what does it have to do with the points he raised?

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[4]: Pretty alive, thanks
by Nth_Man on Thu 30th Aug 2012 07:37 in reply to "RE[3]: Pretty alive, thanks"
Nth_Man Member since:
2010-05-16

> That is nice, but what does it have to do with the points he
> raised?

If he had problems with a half-baked distribution, bad practices using it, a bad choice of software, etc. that doesn't mean that everyone is in the same situation and "What Killed the Linux Desktop". That's why I wrote "like he says" or "unlike he says".

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[5]: Pretty alive, thanks
by lucas_maximus on Thu 30th Aug 2012 07:59 in reply to "RE[4]: Pretty alive, thanks"
lucas_maximus Member since:
2009-08-18

At the end of the day you don't have a decent argument.

You either debunk the points, or you can accept them if they are valid.

The "WORKS FOR ME" defence is a bit of an old joke now.

Reply Parent Score: 0