Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 3rd Sep 2012 00:39 UTC, submitted by MOS6510
Thread beginning with comment 533637
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Not at all.
I would love one of those, given that it had a capable CPU, reasonable GPU, >=8GB of ram, an SSD (>=256GB), and double HD resolution.
I'd be very happy to pay 4K or so for that.
I'd settle for a monitor with more than HD resolution, and capacitive touch, though. It beats me why nobody is doing that. I'd love one at my desk.
I would love one of those, given that it had a capable CPU, reasonable GPU, >=8GB of ram, an SSD (>=256GB), and double HD resolution.
I'd be very happy to pay 4K or so for that.
I'd settle for a monitor with more than HD resolution, and capacitive touch, though. It beats me why nobody is doing that. I'd love one at my desk.
Most people don't have $4K of disposable income laying around, and that price range isn't attractive at all to the average user.
Anyways, if there were a big enough market for it I'm sure they would make them. There's no point bothering with little to no ROI.
I'd settle for a monitor with more than HD resolution, and capacitive touch, though. It beats me why nobody is doing that. I'd love one at my desk.
Probably because most users don't fancy the idea of getting RSI.
Touch interfaces make a great idea for portable devices you can rest on your lap, or in kiosks. But for day to day use on a large(ish) monitor, keyboards and mice make far better ergonomics, are cheaper and more accurate.




Member since:
2008-11-25
Not at all.
I would love one of those, given that it had a capable CPU, reasonable GPU, >=8GB of ram, an SSD (>=256GB), and double HD resolution.
I'd be very happy to pay 4K or so for that.
I'd settle for a monitor with more than HD resolution, and capacitive touch, though. It beats me why nobody is doing that. I'd love one at my desk.