Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 3rd Sep 2012 20:46 UTC, submitted by MOS6510
Thread beginning with comment 533717
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Lots of these opinions are "controversial" because they are a load of hogwash.
Hogwash and/or gibberish. For example:
If a method has a second line of code, it is a code smell. Refactor.
What does that even mean?
Having come from a coding background where you were required to know the hardware, and where this is still a vital requirements in my industry, I view high level languages as simply assembling someone else's work.
So I assume this guy programs by waving a magnetised needle over the platter. Hey, wouldn't want to be using somebodies else's work now!





Member since:
2011-05-12
Lots of these opinions are "controversial" because they are a load of hogwash.
I don't think there was any effort to actually filter out rubbish answers.
I think you could say that it is only programming if you don't use a compiler (or even assembler), and be equally (in)valid.