Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 3rd Sep 2012 20:46 UTC, submitted by MOS6510
Thread beginning with comment 533723
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Comment by Soulbender
by satsujinka on Tue 4th Sep 2012 01:04
in reply to "Comment by Soulbender"
Yes, we are living in the future, so stop using exceptions and use maybes/tuples/multiple return values. Or really anything that doesn't turn your execution order into spaghetti.
Also the OOP opinion was actually very reasonable. The author was lamenting the simple fact that OO is too vague. It's hard to have rationale, scientific discussions about something when the proponents of it can't even agree what they're talking about.
RE[2]: Comment by Soulbender
by Soulbender on Tue 4th Sep 2012 04:12
in reply to "RE: Comment by Soulbender"
Or really anything that doesn't turn your execution order into spaghetti.
Good thing that is impossible to do with return values, eh?
The author was lamenting the simple fact that OO is too vague.
Seriously, what does it matter? As long as the OO model in the language you use makes sense and you know when to use and when not to.
RE[2]: Comment by Soulbender
by sherriffwoody on Tue 4th Sep 2012 07:56
in reply to "RE: Comment by Soulbender"
"2. If it's not native, it's not really programming
Wow, second item and the bullshit-o-meter is already peaking. This is just stupid elitism. "
Pseudo-elitism.
Any interpreted functional language like LISP or Haskell is way harder and sophisticated than most native procedural language like C or even ASM.





Member since:
2005-08-18
Wow, second item and the bullshit-o-meter is already peaking. This is just stupid elitism.
Yeah, because making things artificially difficult is awesome. What language has "Repeat" anyway? Does he mean "for"?
I'm nor a fan of nor do I program in .net but this is just more elitist nonsense.
And the stupidity just goes on and on. We don't have to code the same way we did in the 80's anymore. Not every language is C. It's called progress.
More elitist nonsense.
Yes, readable code is a very bad idea. Or not. Brackets are apparently awesome though.
Because everyone's screen is the same size. So if I have a wide monitor standing on the side it's perfectly ok to have a class that's really long?
This whole thing is just some C programmer(s) that got butthurt.
Edited 2012-09-03 22:48 UTC