Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 3rd Sep 2012 20:46 UTC, submitted by MOS6510
Thread beginning with comment 533751
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Comment by Soulbender
by satsujinka on Tue 4th Sep 2012 06:24
in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by Soulbender"
None of the things I mentioned do it by default (you have to make the decision to have spaghetti code.) try/catch/finally does it by default. That's the whole reason you people use it.
The definition of OO matters when we want to have serious discussions about it. It's sort of hard to judge the merits of something that lacks a solid definition.
RE[4]: Comment by Soulbender
by Soulbender on Tue 4th Sep 2012 07:51
in reply to "RE[3]: Comment by Soulbender"
RE[4]: Comment by Soulbender
by Soulbender on Tue 4th Sep 2012 07:57
in reply to "RE[3]: Comment by Soulbender"





Member since:
2005-08-18
Good thing that is impossible to do with return values, eh?
Seriously, what does it matter? As long as the OO model in the language you use makes sense and you know when to use and when not to.