Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 3rd Sep 2012 20:46 UTC, submitted by MOS6510
Thread beginning with comment 533867
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
"And that's the fault of the language is it?
A problem doesn't mean fault. (See hardware drivers for FOSS OS'es)
Also, you're being defensive. "
Can't see how I can avoid being defensive when I'm writing in defense of C++...
I just can't believe the fuzzy thinking that goes into tech criticism. Problems with programmers are confused with the problems of the language. Personal preferences are confused with problems of the language. What you call defensive, I call seeking to get people to understand what they're saying rather than just "X is bad because of completely unrelated reasons".
* Unlike most other geeks, I don't have a problem with fuzzy thinking in general. I appreciate it for the creativity it can produce, but not for deductive reasoning.




Member since:
2007-02-18
I think I already expressed this from a perspective of a person that has to hire developers to develop and maintain a codebase.
When you are a lone star programmer - C++ is great.
When you have to work with a large group of people - then it becomes a problem. "
And that's the fault of the language is it?
As another person pointed out, there is a large overlap between C++ and C. So in practice, most people actually do have similar ideas about C++.
You're confusing design with code. Programmers will always have different ideas about what DESIGN to use, whatever language it's implemented in.
Compared to languages like Python and Lisp and Java, C++ is no worse off in the different language facilities that people think of using.