Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 5th Sep 2012 10:43 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 533929
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Incompetent, but ...
by WereCatf on Wed 5th Sep 2012 11:34
in reply to "RE[2]: Incompetent, but ..."
RE[4]: Incompetent, but ...
by arb1 on Wed 5th Sep 2012 11:53
in reply to "RE[3]: Incompetent, but ..."
"Good artists copy great artists steal" - Steve Jobs
edit: http://arb1ter.dyndns.org/images/mouth.jpg
just thought i would add that image to describe when this guy opens his mouth
Edited 2012-09-05 12:07 UTC
RE[4]: Incompetent, but ...
by kwan_e on Thu 6th Sep 2012 02:46
in reply to "RE[3]: Incompetent, but ..."
You should have already realized that it is copying only when someone does the same thing as Apple does, not vice versa.
Really, people seem to often forget that they LITERALLY copied an operating system. They may have well just selected the folder named "FREE KERNELS FOR STEAL" and pressed Command-C*.
In today's environment, a lot of the stuff in those kernels are probably patentable and certainly a lot more substantial in terms of actual innovation than they're worthless patents.
* Was never a Mac user so I don't know if that copies folders. Or maybe they just used a mouse.





Member since:
2011-05-11
Yes, I agree.
The best scenario would have been no trial at all.
I am far from being an expert in this field (possibly even worst than the foreman!) but something that always intrigued me is how Apple, Inc. takes a de-facto, successful design (ie. laptop design: rectangular foldable computer with screen and keyboard separated) and has no problem with it!
They didn't "invent" the laptop but are quite happy at selling their own.
Please correct me if I'm seeing this from the wrong angle...
Edited 2012-09-05 11:32 UTC