Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 3rd Sep 2012 20:46 UTC, submitted by MOS6510
Thread beginning with comment 533944
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/16/13 9:29 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2009-08-18
The IDE can be be configured to provide a set.
I don't use them for large projects with several thousand files, I used them as documentation for a particular component or set of components.
They don't necessarily have to be totally up-2-date. As long as I see how the classes fit together it is better than "Find All References" in VS and trying to fit it all together in my head.
For non-technical people such as Project Managers or a Higher a flow diagram is quite easy to understand.
I mostly work with .NET and Front End Web Tech. I find UML mostly redundant for what I do unless it is specifying either class diagrams or part of the ORM for the Data Access Layer.