Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 6th Sep 2012 21:32 UTC, submitted by MOS6510
Thread beginning with comment 534211
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: yes... but why?
by Slambert666 on Fri 7th Sep 2012 09:09
in reply to "RE[2]: yes... but why?"
Except in most projects better hardware will be cheaper than one month salary for a top programmer.
Except in most cases today the program you write starts out at using 2% of total CPU and then you spend a month getting to 1.8% ...
Performance outside of Databases and Games and sometimes embedded systems and web server is mostly not relevant today.
RE[4]: yes... but why?
by dorin.lazar on Fri 7th Sep 2012 09:58
in reply to "RE[3]: yes... but why?"
Performance outside of Databases and Games and sometimes embedded systems and web server is mostly not relevant today.
You might be amazed, but performance matters. On the mobile phones, where it saves batter, on the server, where it's not always easy to add extra RAM or processing power. That 10% can be vital.
Performance matters, all the time.





Member since:
2005-07-08
Except in most projects better hardware will be cheaper than one month salary for a top programmer.
So sadly in the corporate world, no one would care for those 10% gain thanks to better coders, and would rather invest in better hardware.