Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 7th Sep 2012 15:46 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 534274
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: That's the thing about MAD...
by bfr99 on Fri 7th Sep 2012 17:42
in reply to "That's the thing about MAD..."
[q]Especially in a standoff like the patents have been in for decades. Things only work out so long as no one breaks the stalemate and everyone works together for their common good rather than start lobbing bombs and possibly losing everything. It wasn't the best situation but to a degree it was working.
Companies working together for their common good is a nice definition of a trust, illegal under US law. Adam Smith pointed this out long ago.
RE[2]: That's the thing about MAD...
by bassbeast on Sat 8th Sep 2012 11:51
in reply to "RE: That's the thing about MAD..."
RE[2]: That's the thing about MAD...
by bornagainenguin on Sun 9th Sep 2012 21:20
in reply to "RE: That's the thing about MAD..."
bfr99 replied...
Especially in a standoff like the patents have been in for decades. Things only work out so long as no one breaks the stalemate and everyone works together for their common good rather than start lobbing bombs and possibly losing everything. It wasn't the best situation but to a degree it was working.
Companies working together for their common good is a nice definition of a trust, illegal under US law. Adam Smith pointed this out long ago.
Companies working together for their common good is a nice definition of a trust, illegal under US law. Adam Smith pointed this out long ago.
Errr... when I said these companies were working together for their common good, I meant agreeing to cross-license to avoid breaking the patent stalemate the way Apple is now, not price-fixing or cartel behavior. I was talking about agreeing to "work together" in the sense of I'll let you use my patent if you let me use yours. Which was the intention of the patent system as I understand it, to encourage use, not lock inventions up for decades so no one would use them!
Of course no one really saw a situation coming where a company was willing to Kamikaze if it meant knocking out the competition....
--bornagainpenguin





Member since:
2005-08-07
Especially in a standoff like the patents have been in for decades. Things only work out so long as no one breaks the stalemate and everyone works together for their common good rather than start lobbing bombs and possibly losing everything. It wasn't the best situation but to a degree it was working.
Now Apple comes along and starts tossing around patent nuclear bombs, is it any surprise then that an affected bystander would decide to launch a preemptive sneak attack?
Considering the completely different approaches taken culturally between Western and Eastern companies I'd say that this situation is only about to get worse and be a fount of unintended consequences far beyond what we've already seen here....
--bornagainpenguin