Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 7th Sep 2012 15:46 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 534276
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
About time the Patent troll of the century got what was coming. Suckers!
Apple is certainly doing some crappy things with patents, but I'm really getting sick of the term patent troll being misused. Apple is not a patent troll, which is a company that acquires large patent portfolios and then does absolutely nothing with them until they can bring in a large chunk of cash by suing other companies that actually create products. Acasia technologies, for example, is a textbook patent troll and I believe they've come up on here at least once. Let me be clear: I do not like patents at all. I hate them, and I absolutely despise what Apple is currently doing with them, but you cannot call them a patent troll. They actually bring products to market which use the patents they have. A patent tyrant perhaps, but not a troll.
Well in some cases a patent tyrant is fitting. What would you call Steve Jobs who goes to a R&D company and sees what they are working on, and sees the future of graphical interfaces, and the mouse, and then run over and make his own graphical interface right after. And patent most of the basic concepts? What would you call that person?





Member since:
2005-08-02
About time the Patent troll of the century got what was coming. Suckers!