Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 4th Sep 2012 20:04 UTC, submitted by MOS6510
Thread beginning with comment 534300
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/13/13 14:35 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/11/13 17:07 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/10/13 23:13 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/08/13 14:57 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/07/13 11:40 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/04/13 12:45 UTC
Linked by nfeske on 05/31/13 10:12 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/29/13 16:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 17:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2010-03-11
It's nice that the standard is that long, but irrelevant. A great deal of that standard (if it's anything like Scheme's) deals with implementation details, which are mostly irrelevant to programming (at least until you get to the optimization stage.)
The fact of the matter is that Lisp's form makes it simple, to use and understand. Regardless of how large the standard document is.
Of course, as you might gather, I'm more of into Scheme than Common Lisp. Which also more truly embodies the "simple" description.