Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 8th Sep 2012 11:58 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 534414
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[7]: The patent troll apple again
by MOS6510 on Sun 9th Sep 2012 09:06
in reply to "RE[6]: The patent troll apple again"
I agree, but that's a whole different subject. This is about Samsung yet again copying Apple stuff. It's becoming hard to sum up all the stuff they copied without leaving something out.
Samsung copies Apple and sells a lot of stuff, Nokia (and RIM) doesn't copy and doesn't sell lots.
This makes me wonder why people claim the Apple vs Samsung verdict is bad for customer choice and innovation. If companies kept on copying Apple we'd end up with iPhones and iPhone look-a-likes. Nokia, who does offer a good and different product, doesn't even get a chance to show its goods because everybody wants an iPhone or something that looks like it.
RE[8]: The patent troll apple again
by WereCatf on Sun 9th Sep 2012 09:11
in reply to "RE[7]: The patent troll apple again"
RE[8]: The patent troll apple again
by Thom_Holwerda on Sun 9th Sep 2012 10:09
in reply to "RE[7]: The patent troll apple again"
Nokia, who does offer a good and different product
That's the problem here. The jury in the US ruled that Samsung phones with keyboards and phones with like 5 weirdly arranged buttons below the screen infringed iPhone *design* patents. If those phones infringe, then sure AS HELL Nokia's Lumias would have been found infringing as well, had they been part of the case.
Many people seem to think this is only about the Galaxy Ace - it's not. A whole sew of CLEARLY different devices were found infringing on design patents, and arguing that's okay is arguing nobody should be allowed to compete with Apple at all.
RE[8]: The patent troll apple again
by thavith_osn on Sun 9th Sep 2012 11:38
in reply to "RE[7]: The patent troll apple again"
RE[8]: The patent troll apple again
by _xmv on Sun 9th Sep 2012 23:10
in reply to "RE[7]: The patent troll apple again"
Samsung copies Apple and sells a lot of stuff, Nokia (and RIM) doesn't copy and doesn't sell lots.
This makes me wonder why people claim the Apple vs Samsung verdict is bad
when HTC was selling a lot, Apple was suying HTC.
Now Samsung beat HTC to that and got sued by apple
I guess the Nexus One looked like an iphone to you?
RE[8]: The patent troll apple again
by BallmerKnowsBest on Mon 10th Sep 2012 21:05
in reply to "RE[7]: The patent troll apple again"
This makes me wonder why people claim the Apple vs Samsung verdict is bad for customer choice and innovation.
Let me see if I understand correctly... if a company sells a "copy" that's comparable to a more expensive product, then in your mind that's bad for consumer choice? And to you, being able to produce a product that's comparable to a competitors (but less expensive) isn't innovative? So rounded corners on a rectangle are innovative, but more efficient manufacturing processes aren't?
Even if everyone followed your example & blindly accepted the notion that Samsung does nothing but copy Apple, then you still have to ignore all of those details to conclude that it has no possible benefits for consumer choice.





Member since:
2006-02-15
Neither Apple nor Samsung should be allowed to patent that, there's simply absolutely NOTHING new or inventive in either patent application. Those things -- including the controls and all -- have been done already in the 80s.