Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 8th Sep 2012 11:58 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 534438
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[19]: The patent troll apple again
by MOS6510 on Sun 9th Sep 2012 13:55
in reply to "RE[18]: The patent troll apple again"
There is no way to know for sure.
The period in which there were a large number of different computer systems probably would have lasted much longer. Commodore and Atari may have had a longer run or even still be around today. New companies would have had a chance to bring out new systems with some hope of grabbing enough marketshare to survive.
The difference between a Dell, HP, Acer, Lenovo, etc... is really just the logo they stick on the front. Even an Apple iMac is just a x86 PC running OS X.
RE[20]: The patent troll apple again
by Janvl on Sun 9th Sep 2012 17:15
in reply to "RE[19]: The patent troll apple again"





Member since:
2007-02-20
@ MOS6510
Just for the record, where would the IT industry be today had IBM forbidden to clone the first PC's?