Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 9th Sep 2012 22:58 UTC
Mac OS X "A little more than an year ago I wrote my rant post The Linux Desktop Experience is Killing Linux on the Desktop and for the first time in 8 years I wasn't a desktop Linux user anymore. I spent about a month wrestling with Windows 7, but let's face it - Windows is ill suited for professional Ruby programmers like me (and it's ill suited for most programmers, except maybe Java & .Net I guess). Anyways, it was never my intention to stick with Windows - I was just doing my Mac due diligence. Now with 1+ year of OSX usage I'd like to share a few things about my experience thus far with you."
Thread beginning with comment 534494
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
some questions
by TechGeek on Mon 10th Sep 2012 02:02 UTC
Member since:

Why do people use fonts as an example that OS X is better? Don't fonts run on pretty much any system you install them on? Is there some kind of difference between font rendering?

Reply Score: 3

RE: some questions
by Gullible Jones on Mon 10th Sep 2012 03:28 in reply to "some questions"
Gullible Jones Member since:

Bytecode hinting, probably. I used OSX once - an old PowerPC version, mind - and the fonts looked quite good.

Mind, my experience is that font rendering varies a lot from monitor to monitor. For instance, on most laptops I've used, Linux renders much better than Windows ClearType; while on my 1280x1024 desktop monitor, Windows renders fonts more readable than Linux. I know there are lots of people whining about fonts on whatever OS compared to whatever other OS, but at this point I believe they all do a pretty good job of it.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[2]: some questions
by Hypnos on Mon 10th Sep 2012 03:51 in reply to "RE: some questions"
Hypnos Member since:

You may find this interesting:

I am using these patches on Gentoo (they're in the Portage tree, keyword masked) and my font rendering is superb. I prefer my settings to what is default on OSX.

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE: some questions
by Neolander on Mon 10th Sep 2012 05:09 in reply to "some questions"
Neolander Member since:

Most operating systems render fonts by aligning character features on screen pixel boundaries for crisper rendering, slightly altering character shape in the process.

OS X doesn't, and instead resorts to heavy antialiasing to follow the true character shape more exactly. This gives its font rendering engine a characteristic blurry look.

In the end, deciding which one is better is really a matter of taste, as comparative studies have ultimately shown that people prefer the font rendering methodology used by their main OS. It can be argued that the OS X way is less readable, especially on lower-res screens, but more pleasant-looking and typographically accurate.

Reply Parent Score: 8