Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 9th Sep 2012 22:58 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 534514
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Comment by MOS6510
by MOS6510 on Tue 11th Sep 2012 16:18
in reply to "RE: Comment by MOS6510"
Yes, I can understand why you feel that way and more people have this same opinion.
For me Tiger also holds a special place. It was solid and no nonsense.
Each time I upgrade to a new OS X version I'm
disappointed at first, but after a while I start to get used to it. When I use a Mac with an older version of OS X I realise I'm missing features I got used to.
But I agree Tiger was solid and newer version of OS X seem less "whole", some things feel like add-ons or plugins.




Member since:
2011-05-12
I switched from Linux to OS X in 2005. It was an iMac G5 running Panther (10.3).
To be honest it was a bit of a disappointment. It wasn't as fast as I hoped it to be, the email client didn't support IMAP subfolders, the browser was crappy, like were most applications.
So I downloaded Firefox, used mutt and slrn in a terminal window ssh'ing to my Linux server while trying to find acceptable native replacements.
Things changed with Tiger (10.4) though and from then on things only got better.
What I do miss is a nice and clear text console. When doing geeky stuff in Linux I liked to switch from the GUI to the CLI, not in a terminal window but the real text console.
What I don't miss about Linux is all the time spend fixing stuff, making things work. Well, sometimes this was fun and very educational, but when you become a married working father you don't have too much spare time.
My first distro was SuSE, then Red Hat for a long time, back to SuSE, Slackware, Debian, Ubuntu.