To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Maybe Thom can shed some light on how many articles get submitted and how many get rejected.
I can imagine most will be written by amateurs, because professionals will have their own media to publish their works. But I think amateur articles, even if written very badly, should get accepted. It will give them a chance to learn and improve and it's nice to see what people who aren't skilled in writing think. The opinion of a child can be more valuable than the one of an expert.
It seems a number of OSNews readers have a personal blog were they write stuff, maybe they should submit links to those articles.
But apart from all the Apple stuff I'm quite pleased with the rest of the linked articles. Only it seems Thom is the only active member of an otherwise idle team. There isn't a page where they are all listed, but you can find a few on http://www.osnews.com/contact
Viewing this page yesterday I learned of someone called Smith Johnson, who is an undercover reporter, who doesn't seem to be reporting anything. The rest doesn't seem very active either. Most activity seemed to have stopped in 2011.
If just a few more people would at least link submitted linked articles it would make it same more like a team effort. Now it's "Linked by Thom Holwerda" everywhere, giving him a bad imagine of a cheap linker.
I can imagine most will be written by amateurs, because professionals will have their own media to publish their works. But I think amateur articles, even if written very badly, should get accepted. It will give them a chance to learn and improve and it's nice to see what people who aren't skilled in writing think. The opinion of a child can be more valuable than the one of an expert.
It seems a number of OSNews readers have a personal blog were they write stuff, maybe they should submit links to those articles.
But apart from all the Apple stuff I'm quite pleased with the rest of the linked articles. Only it seems Thom is the only active member of an otherwise idle team. There isn't a page where they are all listed, but you can find a few on http://www.osnews.com/contact
Viewing this page yesterday I learned of someone called Smith Johnson, who is an undercover reporter, who doesn't seem to be reporting anything. The rest doesn't seem very active either. Most activity seemed to have stopped in 2011.
If just a few more people would at least link submitted linked articles it would make it same more like a team effort. Now it's "Linked by Thom Holwerda" everywhere, giving him a bad imagine of a cheap linker.
Over the last two years i did email a few times.
I also bitched a few times about articles not being submitted. Look at my submissions and you see the extent of it. (It only show the last 50).
My conclusion after it all is that this really is a hobby site, though a very serious hobby site.
Tom probably would love to write more stuff. Probably love to guide people in writing to his required level of standard, but you rarely hear anything from him. The man is just very busy from what i gather, running two businesses. I can only imagine the mental fatigue of a translator as well.
David would probably like to contribute more, but it does take lots of time, and from what i gather he has a few business keeping him very busy as well.
Funny the other day i read Gruber makes $500000 a year from his Daring Fireball blog.
With that kind of income you can pretty much only concentrate on writing.
Edited 2012-09-10 07:46 UTC





Member since:
2010-08-06
My guess is this site has a few thousand active readers. Anyone can write or submit an article, most don't. I don't think it's fair to almost demand more effort from Thom. This is his hobby, not a paid job.
I've put in some effort to submit links to articles that are more interesting, more technical, more educational and less Apple/pattent related and a number did get linked (by Thom). If more people did this Thom has more choice to pick really good ones.
The problem imo is that the editors expect a higher quality from submitters than what they write themselves.
This make it very daunting to contribute since you get extremely scrutinized by someone with a degree in journalism and language.
This is not all the time every time, but it is true to some extent of the submissions.
Edited 2012-09-10 06:55 UTC