Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 8th Sep 2012 14:01 UTC, submitted by MOS6510
Hardware, Embedded Systems "Most applications do not deal with disks directly, instead storing their data in files in a file system, which protects us from those scoundrel disks. After all, a key task of the file system is to ensure that the file system can always be recovered to a consistent state after an unplanned system crash (for example, a power failure). While a good file system will be able to beat the disks into submission, the required effort can be great and the reduced performance annoying. This article examines the shortcuts that disks take and the hoops that file systems must jump through to get the desired reliability."
Thread beginning with comment 534629
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[9]: So
by Neolander on Mon 10th Sep 2012 18:43 UTC in reply to "RE[8]: So"
Neolander
Member since:
2010-03-08

There are indeed various issues that prevent me from regularly spending time on my hobbies, instead operating in bursts of activity, but that's not what made me quit working on OSnews.

As I struggled to get some spare time in 2011, I found out that I did not have what it takes to simultaneously work on two tech blogs and a kernel codebase. That I wanted to do too much at once. This became especially apparent when I could not get myself to finish an article series on OSnews on the bada operating system, while my personal blog continued to operate at a relatively slow rate.

So I had to choose and, well, I chose TOSP.

EDIT : Perhaps one thing which I could do would be to submit some of my best blog articles to OSnews, though. But I fear that it would do nothing to help against the "OSnews is just a bunch of links" angry opinion. Furthermore, it could just sound like me trying to get some free advertising, and annoy editors. In the end, I only do it when I really need people's attention (e.g. with the surveys on multimonitor usage and IRQs on non-x86 architectures, and the RFC on my RPC design)

I would prefer it if people who read my blog submitted my articles to OSnews themselves when they find them interesting, sounds more balanced. So far, no one has done it, though, which gives fuel to my impression that they may not belong here.

Edited 2012-09-10 19:14 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[10]: So
by fran on Mon 10th Sep 2012 19:05 in reply to "RE[9]: So"
fran Member since:
2010-08-06

There are indeed various issues that prevent me from regularly spending time on my hobbies, instead operating in bursts of activity, but that's not what made me quit working on OSnews.

As I struggled to get some spare time in 2011, I found out that I did not have what it takes to simultaneously work on two tech blogs and a kernel codebase. That I wanted to do too much at once. This became especially apparent when I could not get myself to finish an article series on OSnews on the bada operating system, while my personal blog continued to operate at a relatively slow rate.



Writing the articles take a long time.
Lesser so if you have the privilege of gonzo journalism. Turning a three paragraph into a 5-6 one without much research while in fact being more entertaining.
I think it is why people like to read Thom's stuff.

On the subject of linking the landscape is becoming more complicated. Germany has passed laws where a linker must royalties to the OP and the same law is proposed in France.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[11]: So
by zima on Tue 11th Sep 2012 04:46 in reply to "RE[10]: So"
zima Member since:
2005-07-06

On the subject of linking the landscape is becoming more complicated. Germany has passed laws where a linker must royalties to the OP and the same law is proposed in France.

DE seriously did that? I have a hard time believing that... it would essentially break the very concept of hypertext.

(and would be even more sad with FR, considering that's where the first website and web server were)

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[10]: So
by Alfman on Tue 11th Sep 2012 14:48 in reply to "RE[9]: So"
Alfman Member since:
2011-01-28

[Off topic warning...]

You don't even have kids yet...just you wait! Kids are so lovable, but it's absolutely true what they say about not having time for anything else. Just pray yours sleeps well, because otherwise you won't even have time to sleep. For the first year of our child's life we had to struggle with fatigue because it regularly took two hours to get her sleep around by 10PM, then she'd wake up at 2AM and we'd have to repeat it. This every single night for a year. I lost my job over lost productivity. My wife had felt guilty about letting our daughter cry at night, but eventually gave in to letting her learn to sooth herself when she cried. She still wakes up now but it's much easier to put her back to sleep.


I have a survey related to this:
How many let their kids "cry it out" versus soothing their cries no matter what? Child care professionals have sharply divided opinions over this.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[11]: So
by Neolander on Tue 11th Sep 2012 19:13 in reply to "RE[10]: So"
Neolander Member since:
2010-03-08

Heh, reminds me of a mail exchange between us that I still have to answer to someday ;)

Reply Parent Score: 1