Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 8th Sep 2012 14:01 UTC, submitted by MOS6510
Hardware, Embedded Systems "Most applications do not deal with disks directly, instead storing their data in files in a file system, which protects us from those scoundrel disks. After all, a key task of the file system is to ensure that the file system can always be recovered to a consistent state after an unplanned system crash (for example, a power failure). While a good file system will be able to beat the disks into submission, the required effort can be great and the reduced performance annoying. This article examines the shortcuts that disks take and the hoops that file systems must jump through to get the desired reliability."
Thread beginning with comment 534632
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[10]: So
by fran on Mon 10th Sep 2012 19:05 UTC in reply to "RE[9]: So"
fran
Member since:
2010-08-06

There are indeed various issues that prevent me from regularly spending time on my hobbies, instead operating in bursts of activity, but that's not what made me quit working on OSnews.

As I struggled to get some spare time in 2011, I found out that I did not have what it takes to simultaneously work on two tech blogs and a kernel codebase. That I wanted to do too much at once. This became especially apparent when I could not get myself to finish an article series on OSnews on the bada operating system, while my personal blog continued to operate at a relatively slow rate.



Writing the articles take a long time.
Lesser so if you have the privilege of gonzo journalism. Turning a three paragraph into a 5-6 one without much research while in fact being more entertaining.
I think it is why people like to read Thom's stuff.

On the subject of linking the landscape is becoming more complicated. Germany has passed laws where a linker must royalties to the OP and the same law is proposed in France.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[11]: So
by zima on Tue 11th Sep 2012 04:46 in reply to "RE[10]: So"
zima Member since:
2005-07-06

On the subject of linking the landscape is becoming more complicated. Germany has passed laws where a linker must royalties to the OP and the same law is proposed in France.

DE seriously did that? I have a hard time believing that... it would essentially break the very concept of hypertext.

(and would be even more sad with FR, considering that's where the first website and web server were)

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[12]: So
by fran on Tue 11th Sep 2012 11:52 in reply to "RE[11]: So"
fran Member since:
2010-08-06

"The German cabinet backed a draft law requiring Google and other news aggregators to pay for summarized information they display before linking to a source – a move that has outraged the Internet giant, politicians and bloggers alike.
The move, backed by publishing giants like the Axel Springer group, was originally proposed by the Federation of German News Publishers – who were very upset with lost advertising revenue."

http://rt.com/news/germany-law-google-copyright-973/

It still in draft though.

Reply Parent Score: 2