Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 14th Sep 2012 22:30 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 535147
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Comment by ilovebeer
by dsmogor on Sat 15th Sep 2012 12:01
in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by ilovebeer"
RE[4]: Comment by ilovebeer
by dsmogor on Sun 16th Sep 2012 13:53
in reply to "RE[3]: Comment by ilovebeer"





Member since:
2007-11-11
/looks at CPU-Z, Authentic AMD/...LOL Wut?
In this case you have an easy and clear choice, AMD has opened up their specs, Intel has chosen to not support Linux on this chip. Unless you are building a supercomputer (which you certainly wouldn't be using Atom chips for) then all you have to do is walk across the street, AMD has the Bobcat I and soon the Bobcat II quads, tada!
Intel has the right to choose who they want to support, remember that is what we are talking here, no software locks, simply not supporting an OS, and YOU have the right to shop somewhere else.
It's called the free market and voting with your wallet. try it, you might like it. I know I'm quite happy with my AMD E350 netbook and my Thuban X6 desktop.