Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 14th Sep 2012 22:30 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 535192
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-08-18
[Remnove comment that does not apply anyway]
Maybe, maybe not but that's not what we're discussing anyway.
You could also argue that a lot of commercial projects would not have succeeded without the OSS projects they build on and use but that's also not the point.
Who's talking about dirty money anyway? Not me that's for sure.
The point is, for those of you who somehow fail to see it, both closed and open-source software and systems spur advancements and contribute to the field.
I really don't know why some are so dead set against this simple fact.
Edited 2012-09-15 12:11 UTC