Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 14th Sep 2012 22:30 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 535226
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: What a bunch of fud.
by deathshadow on Sat 15th Sep 2012 17:02
in reply to "What a bunch of fud."
RE[2]: What a bunch of fud.
by WereCatf on Sat 15th Sep 2012 17:08
in reply to "RE: What a bunch of fud."
RE[2]: What a bunch of fud.
by 0brad0 on Sat 15th Sep 2012 19:18
in reply to "RE: What a bunch of fud."
I have to really agree with this - the very language of the article is back-assward... Oh noes, the chip maker doesn't support the OS... and?!?
Since when has it even worked that direction? Operating systems support chips, not the other way around!
Since when has it even worked that direction? Operating systems support chips, not the other way around!
You seriously must be living under a rock if you're this clueless.





Member since:
2007-04-13
" Intel's claim that Clover Trail won't run Linux is not quite true "
A quote from the article agrees. Does Intel actually offer support for linux on any processor? No, not really that much.