To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Just wait what Haier is doing in the future. If they stay in the OHA but stop making new Aliyun devices then you have your answer. Not every company is that stupid (vocal) with there coperate communication like Acer.
oPhone seems to be pre Android 1.0, before the OHA was born, before Android was google. No conflict.
Acer didn't complain. They were going ahead with an anouncement that they thought they could make because Haier had already done the same thing. Then Google threatened them, then Alibaba pointed the finger at Google, not Acer. Then Google admitted it before Acer ever blamed Google.
The OHA was started in 2007. The first oPhone came in 2009. Lenovo introduced and continues to produce the LePhone, a similar not-fully compatible but Android-derivative over the last year or two.
That's nonsense. I already have my answer. I already have proof that 2 OHA members are doing exactly what Google claims is not permitted. Either Google doesn't care, doesn't know its own rules, doesn't enforce its rules, doesn't have these rules, or are being complete hypocrites, changing the rules when it really matters. Either way, it seems very clear that OHA members may not believe that they are required to only support one true Android.





Member since:
2011-04-25
Haier is an OHA member and produces both Aliyun and Android phones. Lenovo is an OHA member and has produced both oPhone and Android phones. And Acer. Satisfied?