To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Maybe they did not care? Maybe it was not on there radar? Maybe they just now realize that its not a single case but other OHA try to do the same and hence they have to do something NOW before all of the OHA do the same?
But yreally who cares? The OHA terms are known since a long time and just because google did not force them last year does not.mean they will never enforce them. That is even a legal fundament our whole system is build up on. Only if you keep on to ignore long enough you may get problems to enforce legally later. But this sin't even a legal case so...
For oPhone its irrelevant how ling it took to bring to the market. oPhone is not.based on google Android. Point. You not agree? Please provide sources that prove your point or accept the facts.




Member since:
2011-04-25
Why would Haier be permitted to release Aliyun phones for a little while but then stopped? Doesn't Google know their own rules?
Also, you keep ignoring the fact that oPhone is not old, pre-Android. Yes, it uses older Android code but it was released 2 years after the OHA was formed. Yes, that old Android code is still Android code.
And, thirdly, yes, the LePhone should also get Lenovo kicked out of the OHA, but that hasn't happened. I'm not going to waste my time educating you and Google about it.
I am merely questioning Google's inconsistency and lack of clarity.