To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Update: Here's are a couple of things on the pros and cons of UEFI and how they relate to Linux:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V2aq5M3Q76U
http://mjg59.dreamwidth.org/11235.html
ssokolow,
Yea I know mjg59 isn't a big fan of UEFI, although I've only heard his take as it related to secure boot. I'll have to wait till I have more time to really follow your links. (very good find though, thanks for linking them!)
Regarding webcam compatibility, I haven't a clue what the box said, only that win7 was supported, which was good enough for me (user reviews revealed linux compatibility too). I don't mind that I needed a driver - the main point is that one is available. To me, the benefit of standard drivers would mean that manufacturer drivers could be loaded in independent operating systems even if manufacturers don't specifically cater to them. It would give a new breath of opportunity to homebrew OS developers.
Edited 2012-09-18 01:08 UTC




Member since:
2010-01-21
To be honest, I find UEFI ominous because, apparently, most motherboard manufacturers start with Intel's reference implementation and end up with something as big and complex as an OS kernel.
It's bad enough that the motherboard's firmware now contains enough of a network stack to spy on you and phone home if subverted. Does it really also need to be so big that it's statistically guaranteed to have exploits?
(When this BIOS-based motherboard breaks, I'm either going to buy a replacement from the crop of pre-Win8 mobos or I'm going to start my shopping at the CoreBoot compatibility list.)