Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 17th Sep 2012 18:12 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 535530
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 17:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-02-18
If there is a such a thing as IP then the question becomes trickier - where to draw the line.
The reason why IP doesn't exist is because copyright, patents and trademarks are completely different from each other and should not be lumped together under IP.
Intellectual Property is designed to be a vague concept, because it allows ideas themselves to come under the category. The ability to fence off ideas is ridiculous, but that is what the concept of IP is intended for and is doing.