Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 17th Sep 2012 23:05 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 535568
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Comment by drcouzelis
by Bill Shooter of Bul on Tue 18th Sep 2012 14:09
in reply to "Comment by drcouzelis"
Yeah, I was a little confused by that comment as well. My guess was that the previous version of office doesn't suck, so why buy a newer version that won't be better enough to justify the cost. Back in 2001 you had office 2000 which was good, but screwed up compatibility with previous versions of office. If a user opened an access document with access 2000 and wanted to edit something, it was transformed into a format that users still with office 97 couldn't use. Office XP fixed that, allowing users to edit access docs in any previous version without transforming it into a newer version.




Member since:
2010-01-11
Hi, Thom!
This totally made me laugh.
Maybe my problem is that I've been using free and open source software for so long I have no idea what current pricing models are.
Anyway, thank you!