Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 18th Sep 2012 21:45 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 535631
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
When did Microsoft submit FAT as a standard for anything to any standardizing group?
Yeah, never, so that's the difference between MS and Rambus.
Yeah, never, so that's the difference between MS and Rambus.
True, the comparison to Rambus is inadequate, however we do see MS abusing their dominant position in the PC market here. In order to allow for interoperability, you need to implement their proprietary filesystem, which is patent encumbered. Not doing so puts you at a significant disadvantage in the market. Not saying that this isn't exactly established practice in the industry though (such as standards being encumbered by FRAND nonsense patents and the like...)
RE[4]: Where is the EU?
by pgquiles on Wed 19th Sep 2012 05:29
in reply to "RE[3]: Where is the EU? "
we do see MS abusing their dominant position in the PC market here. In order to allow for interoperability, you need to implement their proprietary filesystem, which is patent encumbered.
Paying royalties in order to have interoperability is perfectly fine and the EU will not do anything about that.
The EU would only intervene if Microsoft wouldn't want to license exFAT to others, or if the royalties were way too high.
Remember, this is the same EU which has been trying to approve software patents for years.
RE[3]: Where is the EU?
by JAlexoid on Wed 19th Sep 2012 10:12
in reply to "RE[2]: Where is the EU? "
RE[4]: Where is the EU?
by dsmogor on Wed 19th Sep 2012 12:52
in reply to "RE[3]: Where is the EU? "





Member since:
2006-07-16
When did Microsoft submit FAT as a standard for anything to any standardizing group?
Yeah, never, so that's the difference between MS and Rambus.