To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Janyl,
This patent system did exist back then, but the lawyers hadn't gotten involved in computers yet. So, corporations were more focused on building things rather than litigating.
"...there would not be any apple or microsoft today."
If you didn't watch this recently posted video, you should view it now. He brings up this exact point.
http://vimeo.com/47322970
Jump to 6:55 - 7:20
"Back in the 80s there were no software patents, and it was xerox who pioneered the graphical user interface. Now what if they patented popup menus, scrollbars, the desktop with icons that look like folders and sheets of paper? Would a young and inexperienced apple have survived the legal assault of a much larger and more mature company like xerox?"
The entire presentation hits the nail on the head.
Apple didn't copy from Xerox, they were shown the goods, which they liked, and then Xerox and Apple cooperated on the Macintosh GUI. A number of Xerox people worked at Apple, a number even joining Apple.
I agree if Xerox had patented all their GUI stuff and refused to license them it would have made things more difficult for GUI builders, but as it went Apple didn't copy/steal from Xerox: they worked together.
PS
I recently opened up a Mac Classic II, which was broken, and noticed a number of chips labeled Samsung (and Apple). How things can change.
But the good news is that the Classic works again.





Member since:
2007-02-20
Just wondering, had this patent system existed about 30 or 40 years ago then there would not be any apple or microsoft today.