Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 20th Sep 2012 19:24 UTC
"The major new feature of the company's new iOS 6 mobile operating system is a new mapping module developed by Apple itself - a replacement for the Google-supplied maps that have been standard on the iPhone since it debuted in 2007. It is a change borne not of user demand, but of corporate politics: Google's Android platform is the biggest competitive threat to the iPhone, so Apple is cutting ties with Google. iPhone owners might have loved Google Maps, but Apple has no love for Google. Unfortunately, Apple's new maps are simply not as good as Google's." That's putting it mildly - my own town barely even exists on Apple's maps. It's basically a trainwreck, and according to The Verge, Apple has been working on this for the past five years. This is what happens when a company cares more about stupid grudges than its customers. Considering how much effort it has taken Google to get where it is now with maps, don't expect Apple's maps to even get near Google Maps any times soon. This isn't going to take months - this is going to take several years, if at all.
Thread beginning with comment 535961
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: Comment by Stephen!
by Tony Swash on Fri 21st Sep 2012 12:00
in reply to "RE[4]: Comment by Stephen!"
Member since:2009-08-22
He is also a bigger Apple fanboy than Gruber (which says a lot) and hates Google with a passion, and thus, has a clear motivation to say "no" in this case.
I'm not going to believe that dude.
I'm not going to believe that dude.
Even though he has a 100% track record of verification in relation to Apple rumors? Your standards of evidence are strange.
RE[6]: Comment by Stephen!
by maccouch on Fri 21st Sep 2012 13:41
in reply to "RE[5]: Comment by Stephen!"
Member since:2012-03-14
dude, no offense but where can i find such pristine record of inside information by darlymple?
That seems more one of those things that people say that then become socially accepted truths, no matter no one had ever done such study or even seen such data.
I might be wrong but then, we're back at my original question. Where can i find such record of 100% accuracy?
Edited 2012-09-21 13:42 UTC
RE[6]: Comment by Stephen!
by BallmerKnowsBest on Sat 22nd Sep 2012 20:00
in reply to "RE[5]: Comment by Stephen!"
Member since:2008-06-02
"He is also a bigger Apple fanboy than Gruber (which says a lot) and hates Google with a passion, and thus, has a clear motivation to say "no" in this case.
I'm not going to believe that dude.
I'm not going to believe that dude.
Even though he has a 100% track record of verification in relation to Apple rumors? "
[citation needed]
Your standards of evidence are strange.
WHAT evidence? You haven't provided any - or do you seriously believe that the track record of the person making a claim is the same thing as evidence for that claim? Because it's not, in fact your post could be a textbook example of the "appeal to authority" fallacy.
And even then, you still managed to screw it up, because clearly only iFanboys consider Darlymple to be any kind of actual authority. Pretty sad that you can't even use a fallacious argument properly.
RE[6]: Comment by Stephen!
by JAlexoid on Mon 24th Sep 2012 08:43
in reply to "RE[5]: Comment by Stephen!"
Member since:2009-05-19
RE[5]: Comment by Stephen!
by MOS6510 on Fri 21st Sep 2012 12:29
in reply to "RE[4]: Comment by Stephen!"
Member since:2011-05-12
RE[6]: Comment by Stephen!
by Soulbender on Sat 22nd Sep 2012 06:45
in reply to "RE[5]: Comment by Stephen!"
Member since:2005-08-18
RE[5]: Comment by Stephen!
by konrad on Sat 22nd Sep 2012 07:29
in reply to "RE[4]: Comment by Stephen!"
RE[5]: Comment by Stephen!
by brichpmr on Sat 22nd Sep 2012 12:25
in reply to "RE[4]: Comment by Stephen!"
Member since:2006-04-22
He is also a bigger Apple fanboy than Gruber (which says a lot) and hates Google with a passion, and thus, has a clear motivation to say "no" in this case.
I'm not going to believe that dude.
I'm not going to believe that dude.
Actually, your broad brush opinion says more about you than it does about Gruber. You don't know diddly squat about Gruber's motivations; however, he sounds rather credible being interviewed by Charlie Rose the other night.
RE[5]: Comment by Stephen!
by Tony Swash on Tue 25th Sep 2012 09:53
in reply to "RE[4]: Comment by Stephen!"
Member since:2009-08-22
He is also a bigger Apple fanboy than Gruber (which says a lot) and hates Google with a passion, and thus, has a clear motivation to say "no" in this case.
I'm not going to believe that dude.
I'm not going to believe that dude.
Turns out his was right and you were wrong
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/09/25/us-google-iphone-idUSBRE8...
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
At an event earlier today, Microsoft unveiled the next Xbox - the third model, but confusingly named Xbox One. The big focus was TV, integrated Kinect, and all the other stuff we all expected to be forced down our throats. I think it took them 25 minutes to actually come to what should be the core of the story: gaming. Nothing groundbreaking in the gaming department, except for how Microsoft intends to handle the used games market and borrowing games from friends: pay up, buddy!
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
The day has finally come! Jolla has finally announced the launch device for its Sailfish operating system - and by god this is a looker. It's decidedly different from other phones out there, but it has good specifications and carries a relatively reasonably price tag - EUR 399, and it's up for pre-order today, shipping in the fourth quarter of this year.
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Why does Google get so much credit in the technology industry? Why, despite the company's many obvious failings, do many geeks and enthusiasts still hold a somewhat positive view on the all-knowing technology giant? A specific talk at Google I/O this week provides the answer.
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
OSNews is a sponsor of this year's O'Reilly OSCON in Portland, Oregon, USA. A lucky OSNews reader will win a free three-day pass, including two tutorials days. To win the pass, post a comment on this story saying something about Open Source Software or OSCON. We'll pick a winner at random next week. If you don't have an OSNews account, you may email us your entry. Part of the conference is the 9th annual Open Source Awards, and today the 16th is the deadline for nominations. If you'd like to nominate an outstanding open source contributor, do it here. Read on for more information about OSCON. Update: The 20% discount code for OSNews readers is "OSN."
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
"Windows is indeed slower than other operating systems in many scenarios, and the gap is worsening." That's one way to start an insider explanation of why Windows' performance isn't up to snuff. Written by someone who actually contributes code to the Windows NT kernel, the comment on Hacker News, later deleted but reposted with permission on Marc Bevand's blog, paints a very dreary picture of the state of Windows development. The root issue? Think of how Linux is developed, and you'll know the answer.
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
This is one of those news items that's fun to write, fun to read, fun to comment on, and where no one will be able to say anything unkind. It's all just one big ball of awesome fluffiness. TuneTracker, the BeOS radio automation software, has just released something very special: TuneTracker System 5, the first version designed entirely and specifically for Haiku. In fact, it actually includes Haiku in the software package. Better yet, TuneTracker also unveiled several system-in-a-box products - which have Haiku and TuneTracker pre-installed.
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Exactly twenty years ago, a document was published that played a huge role in establishing the web as we know it today. Twenty years later, and this simple and straightforward document is proof of an irrefutable fact: while closed technologies can change markets, open technologies can change the world.
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Oh multitasking. That staple of computing that got thrown out the window with many modern smartphones. We got some rudimentary thing in its place - but even as multitasking on phone and tablets improves, its user-visible side remains cumbersome. Windows 8 has a neat implementation, and now it's time Android follows in it footsteps.
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
They're here! Whether that excites you or not remains to be seen, but the Galaxy S4, which will most likely become the best selling Android smartphone of the year by a huge margin, has been reviewed by all the major sites, and there's lots of interesting conclusions in there - although I think most of you will get the gist.
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
Nokia has posted its quarterly results for the first quarter of 2013, and just like the quarters that came before, there's not a whole lot of good news in there. The rise in Lumia sales still can't even dream of making up for the sales drop in Symbian phones, and when broken down in versions, the sales figures for Windows Phone 8 Lumias in particular are very disappointing. In North America, Nokia is getting slaughtered.More Features »
Sponsored Links
Member since:
2005-06-29
He is also a bigger Apple fanboy than Gruber (which says a lot) and hates Google with a passion, and thus, has a clear motivation to say "no" in this case.
I'm not going to believe that dude.