Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 20th Sep 2012 22:22 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 536128
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/25/13 0:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2010-03-08
That is an interesting analogy.
Even if people started to use bicycles, motorcycles and public transportation anywhere where they make more sense than cars, such as single-person transportation in a urban context, (easily rented) cars would continue to exist for some purposes, like going on vacation or carrying heavy goods around.
Which is exactly what some people claim is going to happen to the PC: the computer industry wouldn't fix the tablet ecosystem's flaws, since it can make much money off them. Instead, it would focus on making tablets so attractive for their use cases that people would buy one of them first, and only then think about purchasing a PC if they have a need for it.
Which is a disgusting commercial practice if you ask me, but the only thing that matters in the end is whether it will work or not.