Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 22nd Sep 2012 22:07 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 536131
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/16/13 9:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/15/13 22:44 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2008-04-15
I can see why canonical forked debian and over the years it makes sense that a business would do these things.
Why does everyone feel such an unwarranted self importance over their os? I used ubuntu, then as i learn't more i dropped it for debian. I didn't like the way things were changing and i felt software freedom was more important than corporate backing.
Obviously anyone who feels that corporate interests don't fit in Linux should probably look at alternatives as canonical is a business. They really don't owe you anything.