Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 22nd Sep 2012 22:07 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 536149
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: Ubuntu's future doesn't look too bright to me...
by Soulbender on Sun 23rd Sep 2012 11:02
in reply to "RE[4]: Ubuntu's future doesn't look too bright to me..."
Fact is, the burden of proof is on the people who want to change, not on those who're happy with the current UI paradigm
There's actually no burden of proof on anyone. This is not a democracy, it's a private project.
do you really think those couldn't be added within the WIMP paradigm?
But...they are added within the WIMP paradigm. In Unity I still have Windows (with titlebars even), there are icons and menus and it till has full mouse functionality. It's just a different spin on, or layout of, the traditional WIMP paradigm.
RE[6]: Ubuntu's future doesn't look too bright to me...
by Rehdon on Sun 23rd Sep 2012 13:19
in reply to "RE[5]: Ubuntu's future doesn't look too bright to me..."





Member since:
2005-07-06
You speak like you're some kind of authority on the subject. I doubt you are.
"
Fact is, the burden of proof is on the people who want to change, not on those who're happy with the current UI paradigm: where are the usability studies showing that the Unity/Gnome Shell approach is better? where are the comprehensive test groups that I would expect for such important UI changes?
Point number two, I agree that the features you describe are indeed useful, at least for keyboard-oriented people, but was it absolutely necessary to make things so obnoxious for mouse-oriented people? do you really think those couldn't be added within the WIMP paradigm?
Rehdon