Linked by thesunnyk on Sun 23rd Sep 2012 22:14 UTC
Gnome "Gnome 3 has received a lot of disapproval of late, from the Gnome foundation being charged with not taking care of its users, or losing mindshare, to Gnome 3 itself being an unusable mess. I've been using Gnome 3 myself for a few months to sort the truth from the fiction, and to try and understand just how the Gnome foundation expects their newest shell to be used. I will end with some thoughts on how Gnome 3 can be improved. The review will require a fairly lengthy preface, however."
Thread beginning with comment 536245
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Comment by Sodki
by WorknMan on Mon 24th Sep 2012 05:20 UTC in reply to "Comment by Sodki"
WorknMan
Member since:
2005-11-13

As a GNOME 3 user, I agree completely. GNOME 3 is not supposed to be the evolution of GNOME 2: making people realize that is it's biggest challenge.


Maybe they shouldn't have called it Gnome 3 then? I'm just sayin'.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[2]: Comment by Sodki
by adkilla on Mon 24th Sep 2012 06:11 in reply to "RE: Comment by Sodki"
adkilla Member since:
2005-07-07

You mean like how Mac OS 10 is actually Mac OS 9 with prettier Window borders? I thought it was a huge difference. Don't recall seeing the dock and the Aqua interface in OS 9. People did not seem to mind the differences either.

Yeah, they should have called Gnome 3 the Garden Gnome XL Extremist Edition. That way people will get it that it is different and yet it is a product of the GNOME Foundation?

Edited 2012-09-24 06:16 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 4

RE[3]: Comment by Sodki
by cyrilleberger on Mon 24th Sep 2012 08:45 in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by Sodki"
cyrilleberger Member since:
2006-02-01

Don't recall seeing the dock and the Aqua interface in OS 9. People did not seem to mind the differences either.


Are you kidding?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:MacOS922.png

There is a dock (it was introduced in Mac OS _7_ as the "Launcher"), there is a top window menu, even finder's icon is the same.

And now compare it to:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:OS_X_Mountain_Lion_Screenshot.jpg

So yes, for the user "Mac OS 10 is actually Mac OS 9 with prettier Window borders" (btw, Aqua is primarly a GUI theme). Yes, there is a huge difference between OSX and OS9, the Kernel, base systems, APIs and a more modern look, but a OS9 user felt at home right away in OSX, all the GUI elements were rather similar.

Now, as an exercice, try to count how many things are similar between Gnome 2 and 3.

Reply Parent Score: 6

RE[3]: Comment by Sodki
by aliquis on Mon 24th Sep 2012 09:28 in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by Sodki"
aliquis Member since:
2005-07-23

MacOS and MacOS X isn't even the same OS.

Also MacOS was old crap with no future.

Reply Parent Score: 2