Linked by thesunnyk on Sun 23rd Sep 2012 22:14 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 536245
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
You mean like how Mac OS 10 is actually Mac OS 9 with prettier Window borders? I thought it was a huge difference. Don't recall seeing the dock and the Aqua interface in OS 9. People did not seem to mind the differences either.
Yeah, they should have called Gnome 3 the Garden Gnome XL Extremist Edition. That way people will get it that it is different and yet it is a product of the GNOME Foundation?
Edited 2012-09-24 06:16 UTC
RE[3]: Comment by Sodki
by cyrilleberger on Mon 24th Sep 2012 08:45
in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by Sodki"
Don't recall seeing the dock and the Aqua interface in OS 9. People did not seem to mind the differences either.
Are you kidding?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:MacOS922.png
There is a dock (it was introduced in Mac OS _7_ as the "Launcher"), there is a top window menu, even finder's icon is the same.
And now compare it to:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:OS_X_Mountain_Lion_Screenshot.jpg
So yes, for the user "Mac OS 10 is actually Mac OS 9 with prettier Window borders" (btw, Aqua is primarly a GUI theme). Yes, there is a huge difference between OSX and OS9, the Kernel, base systems, APIs and a more modern look, but a OS9 user felt at home right away in OSX, all the GUI elements were rather similar.
Now, as an exercice, try to count how many things are similar between Gnome 2 and 3.





Member since:
2005-11-13
Maybe they shouldn't have called it Gnome 3 then? I'm just sayin'.