Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 24th Sep 2012 15:07 UTC, submitted by MOS6510
Thread beginning with comment 536426
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
So let's accept there is a bug depending on integral representation.
The problem is how do you treat number that consist of 1 followed by a bunch of zeros. So, when he is talking about a bug, he probably wants to treat return value as unsigned int.
I can't see any other problem with the code.




Member since:
2009-08-13
Why are you so shy to explain what's wrong? Seriously, if you would be a teacher, as you try to impose now, you'd be a really bad one.
So let's accept there is a bug depending on integral representation.
The other bug of course is _your_ use of "int", apart from other issues.
---
About the confidentiality: Seriously, I don't know how you define it in your company. But that code is indeed something personal, as are his answers or his resume. Additionally, you've screwed that guy before the others, and possibly no one who opens his/her own company will now ever hire him, or upon changing the job give a recommendation to the boss.
I don't know. The mills of data are patient.
It boils down to: What business do non-HR ppl have with documents from closed-room-interviews? Why use the illusion of a closed room at all (I assume that by the timeline you imply)? Well, let me break your illusion of you being "better".
I'd really like to ask which company that is you work at, so I can put it onto my "never waste money/time on that" blacklist, neither job-wise, nor business-wise.
Edited 2012-09-25 14:00 UTC