Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 26th Sep 2012 23:25 UTC, submitted by MOS6510
General Development "Having read this, one realization is that better code often means less code. I don't think about lines of code exactly, or something similarly stupid, but in terms of meaningful code. However, argument for less code isn't about making code as compact as possible, avoid redundancy, etc. The argument is about not writing code at all whenever reasonable or possible. Should we focus on deciding what should and what should not built instead of polishing our software development craft then? Yes and no. Yeah, I know. Exactly the kind of answer you expected, isn’t it? Anyway, you can't answer this question meaningfully without a context."
Thread beginning with comment 536676
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Eloquence
by DeepThought on Thu 27th Sep 2012 18:18 UTC in reply to "RE: Eloquence"
DeepThought
Member since:
2010-07-17


shorter code != maintainable code.


Hell, no. Or yes ?! Your point is to general. I'm sure any decent programmer wrote code that proves your point correct and also wrong.

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[3]: Eloquence
by Alfman on Thu 27th Sep 2012 19:56 in reply to "RE[2]: Eloquence"
Alfman Member since:
2011-01-28

DeepThought,

That's the problem, these are nice abstract ideologies but they're meaningless in practice since everything is relative. Write as much code as you need, but no more! Well, that almost goes without saying, but it doesn't acknowledge the evolutionary processes that software undergoes to get from A to Z. Like others have said, sometimes more code is better than less, there are so many factors that need to be considered (ie modular versus hardcoded, efficient vs simple, quickly hacked together vs long term managability). It would be ignorant to push forward an absolute ideology up front without even taking into account the specific requirements of a project.

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[3]: Eloquence
by Laurence on Fri 28th Sep 2012 06:10 in reply to "RE[2]: Eloquence"
Laurence Member since:
2007-03-26

"
shorter code != maintainable code.


Hell, no. Or yes ?! Your point is to general. I'm sure any decent programmer wrote code that proves your point correct and also wrong.
"

Which is exactly what I said.

Edited 2012-09-28 06:13 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[4]: Eloquence
by DeepThought on Fri 28th Sep 2012 06:36 in reply to "RE[3]: Eloquence"
DeepThought Member since:
2010-07-17

Sorry, then I missed your point.

Reply Parent Score: 1