Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 28th Sep 2012 21:51 UTC, submitted by MOS6510
General Development "When I started writing programs in the late 80s it was pretty primitive and required a lot of study and skill. I was a young kid doing this stuff, the adults at that time had it even worse and some of them did start in the punch card era. This was back when programmers really had to earn their keep, and us newer generations are losing appreciation for that. A generation or two ago they may have been been better coders than us. More importantly they were better craftsmen, and we need to think about that." I'm no programmer, but I do understand that the current crop of programmers could learn a whole lot from older generations. I'm not going to burn my fingers on if they were better programmers or not, but I do believe they have a far greater understanding of the actual workings of a computer. Does the average 'app developer' have any clue whatsoever about low-level code, let alone something like assembly?
Thread beginning with comment 537039
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Member since:

Well, you also need to add 3 more names to that discovery ;-)

BTW Franklin was a chemist, not a biologist. Sorry to be so anal.

Carry on....

Reply Parent Score: 2

joehms22 Member since:

Franklin was researching the structure of crystals, among them DNA, Watson saw one of her x-ray photographs, and heavily changed their (his and Crick's) model to match what Franklin had found. Luckily she died before the Nobel prize was handed out, as it would have been a mess otherwise. ;-)


(edited to add Nobel prize statement)

Edited 2012-09-30 14:01 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 2