Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 30th Sep 2012 20:15 UTC, submitted by MOS6510
Thread beginning with comment 537175
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2009-03-11
Setting aside the number of views and questions on the purpose, value and implementation of the ObjectScript language, I am curious about the name. Will the project developers run into legal issues regarding the naming of the language, as InterSystem’s Caché, a commercial and multi-platform implementation of the M/MUMPS programming and data store platform with its own object extensions has its own language named ObjectScript? Caché is still in wide use in a number of vertical application markets, such as Secure Financial Management and Transactions, Hospital Information Systems (HIS) and Medical Records Management.
http://vista.intersystems.com/csp/docbook/DocBook.UI.Page.cls?KEY=G...