Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 30th Sep 2012 22:01 UTC

Thread beginning with comment 537177
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Member since:
2007-08-22
No, the appeals court were very much in lock step with the interests of established big businesses. They may as well have built their own that's-no-moon with a two metre wide weak spot.
It is rogue in that it is suppose to follow the precedents set by SCOTUS, and they have even blatantly ignored SCOTUS - including one of their own calling out the rest of the judges on doing so.
If they don't follow the law - written, unwritten (e.g. common law), and judicial precedent - then they in fact rogue.