Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 2nd Oct 2012 00:05 UTC
Multimedia, AV "On October 1 1982, Joel's sixth studio album, 52nd Street, was the first commercially released CD album... Which means CDs are 30-years-old today. It's worth noting here that 52nd Street wasn't a new album - it was launched initially in 1978, but it was selected for relaunch on the new digital audio disc, rolling out alongside the first CD player - the Sony CDP-101 - in Japan. But of course, the CD didn't spring up overnight - the road to launch started long before 1982." I'm still 100% CD when it comes to music. The act of physically holding a new album in your hands for the first time and gently placing the disk in the tray can't be matched by pressing a download button behind a computer.
Thread beginning with comment 537221
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Comment by kwan_e
by WereCatf on Tue 2nd Oct 2012 01:13 UTC in reply to "RE[3]: Comment by kwan_e"
WereCatf
Member since:
2006-02-15

I don't see why they'd need to create a new format for that device when we already have FLAC and others.


Especially since us normal people can't tell the difference anyways.

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[5]: Comment by kwan_e
by UltraZelda64 on Tue 2nd Oct 2012 01:29 in reply to "RE[4]: Comment by kwan_e"
UltraZelda64 Member since:
2006-12-05

Because choice is good for those of us who want it? Audio quality itself is not the *only* reason for choosing one audio codec over another.

Certainly it was the least of my concerns when switching from Monkey's Audio, which I originally ripped all of my audio CDs into in the early 2000s, to FLAC, which I began using in the mid-2000s.

There are a lot of things to look for in an audio codec. Features, performance (CPU usage, encoding/decoding speed), compression ratio, software support, cross-platform OS support, hardware support, openness/patent-free, activity (still maintained and improved or not), etc.

Edited 2012-10-02 01:47 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[6]: Comment by kwan_e
by kwan_e on Tue 2nd Oct 2012 03:35 in reply to "RE[5]: Comment by kwan_e"
kwan_e Member since:
2007-02-18

Because choice is good for those of us who want it?


It's a constant battle between choice and convenience. I like choice, but if the choice makes something less convenience, then the choice isn't really one.

Reply Parent Score: 3