Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 3rd Oct 2012 03:27 UTC
Microsoft "This week marked the real launch of the new Microsoft.com home page. And as someone who has been involved on and off with the project from the moment it was conceived, I thought I'd tell you the story, albeit extensively abridged, behind the new Microsoft.com. Grab a seat." I love the new Microsoft site. It looks very clean and focused.
Thread beginning with comment 537403
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Responsive layout
by arpan on Wed 3rd Oct 2012 06:28 UTC in reply to "Responsive layout"
arpan
Member since:
2006-07-30

Performance needs to be improved.

* 60 requests
* 1.34MB transferred

That's not right for a simple layout that's supposed to work on a mobile! Responsive design isn't just about how it looks, performance is key.

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[2]: Responsive layout
by arpan on Wed 3rd Oct 2012 06:32 in reply to "RE: Responsive layout"
arpan Member since:
2006-07-30

Saved a couple images and ran imageoptim ( http://imageoptim.com/ ) on them. It was able to reduce filesize from 3% to a whopping 60%. ImageOptim uses lossless techniques to reduce file size, so there was absolutely no loss in quality, just a reduction in file size.

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[3]: Responsive layout
by EvilMonkeySlayer on Wed 3rd Oct 2012 15:12 in reply to "RE[2]: Responsive layout"
EvilMonkeySlayer Member since:
2010-04-08

I'm always amazed at how large traffic sites are usually horribly unoptimised to reduce traffic/bandwidth use. Images are the first thing I always look at, putting the PNG images through pngout and optipng for example usually results in some pretty big size reductions.

Reply Parent Score: 3