To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
OOXML? Are you serious? PJ was pretty much spot on about that steaming pile of crap. Microsoft pushed its standard through the ISO. Even now they don't conform to their own standard. In the process they also pretty much broke the ISO, causing a lot of problem for everyone.
And again, you point to a post by a crack pot who has a beef against PJ over a subject he is wholly invested in. And she wasn't wrong. Parts of .Net like ASP are still patent encumbered. Oh, and Moonlight, the beacon in the sky for the reason to everyone to use Mono, got cancelled.
Her original point still stands. Microsoft declared war on Linux, so why should anyone trust them. Its not like they would go around extorting money over vague and changing patent claims on software that is clearly open source. Oh wait.....
You are so delusional, what "crap" are you talking about?
OOXML became an ISO standard, tell me, how did that affected ISO? and what with the fact MS didn't comply entirely with the specification? is not mandatory, just like no browser comply with HTML 5. MS implemented the requirements of the ISO, yeah, even fixing the part of the OOXML specification to make it more open, but hey, Groklaw's and you don't care or omit the history.
So don't try to tell me what happened cause I was also there reading Groklaw's non sense and the opinionated trolls that follow it.
And again, you point to a post by a crack pot who has a beef against PJ over a subject he is wholly invested in. And she wasn't wrong. Parts of .Net like ASP are still patent encumbered. Oh, and Moonlight, the beacon in the sky for the reason to everyone to use Mono, got cancelled.
You are clueless, Groklaw was making statements not on ASP.NET or mono, it was making wrong statements on the MS PL, the open source license apache like licesen from MS, so, come back here when you actually read the article.





Member since:
2005-09-27
Sorry, but I don't buy it, there is a lot more.
I don't trust those information manipulators.
While PJ is certainly opinionated
She goes beyond being opinionated, when the OOXML was in discution she was the one spreading more fud, and time proved her wrong.
Grocklaw's fans are mostly radicals who want to hear all the paranoic and twistted version of the story.
You do believe her? more power to you, I don't.
And here is another case of Groklaw's misinformation:
http://tirania.org/blog/archive/2007/Oct-05-2.html
Edited 2012-10-04 04:54 UTC