Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 3rd Oct 2012 03:27 UTC

Thread beginning with comment 537518
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Must everything now be about 'touch'?
by MollyC on Fri 5th Oct 2012 08:16
in reply to "RE[2]: Must everything now be about 'touch'?"
What's the emotocon for "rolls eyes"? It's needed as a response to your Apple propaganda.
BTW, your hero Steve Jobs is responsible for the tie-dye iMacs. And have you ever used the QuickTime player over the last 15 years? And how about all the fake leather and fake brushed metal and all the other "great" Apple designs? Explain that crap away before talking about what great "taste" Apple has.
RE[4]: Must everything now be about 'touch'?
by Luminair on Fri 5th Oct 2012 23:15
in reply to "RE[3]: Must everything now be about 'touch'?"
Member since:
2007-03-30
apple filters engineered products through designers with taste before the products launch. so the end result is nice and pretty. apple leadership is responsible for this.
when microsoft leadership want something to look pretty, they hire a designer to do it for them. that's because, unlike apple leadership, microsoft leadership never understood both engineering and design. steve jobs did though.
the clusterfuck that is the history of microsoft.com design is the result of microsoft leadership having no taste. short but not sweet.