Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 4th Oct 2012 21:30 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 537652
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: lets stop talking about performance and stability
by Doc Pain on Fri 5th Oct 2012 15:23
in reply to "RE[3]: lets stop talking about performance and stability"
"So any OS, no matter how powerful it is, will not appeal if the installer isn't a pretty conglomerate of GUI dialogs, in sequential manner, with defaults tailored for desktop use.
If you are talking about home users, I agree with you. "
That's what I wanted to point out. Home users are considered the primary audience. Server OS like Solaris seem to be more and more regarded a niche market...
In the enterprise world there are plenty of ugly OS to chose from. For example, I fail to see what systems still running VMS or OS/400 (now z/OS) have to do with pretty.
You're confusing terminology: OS/400 has been called i5/OS, and today IBM i; let's see what name it will have tomorrow, z/OS is what MVS has been (the OS/360 line).
But you're right: Those systems aren't very pretty from a home user's point of view. Still they have strengths (like compatibility back to the 1970's), and many critical businesses (banking anyone?) rely on them. Also OS/400 is still very popular, but nobody really knows that.
VMS may be an exception. I know that MAN DIESEL did /at least 3 years ago) run VMS software on a SimH-emulated VAX system: http://www.openvms.org/stories.php?story=09/09/25/8154763
In my experience, it's not that much about "pretty vs. ugly", it's about "being different while seeing similarities". Still, most advantages come for the price of some inconvenience. I know many of them (having used mainframe, midrange and commercial UNIXes in many different forms) and I agree: There is lots of uglyness in them if you look close enough. :-)
RE[5]: lets stop talking about performance and stability
by moondevil on Fri 5th Oct 2012 21:55
in reply to "RE[4]: lets stop talking about performance and stability"
You're confusing terminology: OS/400 has been called i5/OS, and today IBM i; let's see what name it will have tomorrow, z/OS is what MVS has been (the OS/360 line).
Yeah, I should have looked it up before posting, as it was long time ago I have used such system.
One of my duties during a summer training was to perform backups of an OS/400 system, back in 1994.
RE[4]: lets stop talking about performance and stability
by thegman on Mon 8th Oct 2012 21:17
in reply to "RE[3]: lets stop talking about performance and stability"




Member since:
2005-07-08
If you are talking about home users, I agree with you.
In the enterprise world there are plenty of ugly OS to chose from. For example, I fail to see what systems still running VMS or OS/400 (now z/OS) have to do with pretty.